2-10-2010 – A day for the record books
People are still just hearing about the Chicago earthquake – the FoxNews report of Tuesday’s 4.3 magnitude quake just west of Chi-town.
EVERYONE will hear about the record 3rd powerful Noreaster this winter - and the second in the same week. Obama’s new “Climate Service” unveiling scheduled for yesterday had to be done over the wire instead of live. How apropo.
On this 3rd straight day the US federal government is closed due to Washington DC anticipated actual blizzard conditions, one must ask – “Where’s that Global Warming, er… Climate Change, er… 1/10th of a degree per year?” I’d like 10 degrees TODAY! Really puts it all in perspective, doesn’t it?
I wonder what else 2/10 has in store?
(Jan 26, 2010) IPCC Admits Himalayan Glacier vanishing prediction was a mistake!
More like fraud, if you ask me. It was a transposition of the 2350 into 2035… and then some.
Syed Hasnain is the scientist on whose work the false claims were based, located at The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) in Delhi. TERI is headed by Rajendra Pachauri, also head of the climate change panel. Mr. Hasnain, who denies making “any prediction on date as I am not an astrologer but I did say they were shrinking fast.” … “I have never written 2035 in any of my research papers or reports.”
It seems that a 1999 magazine article transposed a previously reported Himalayan Glacier meltdown date of 2350 – itself a very rough estimate – into the incorrect 2035.
Reprinted from UK TimesOnline on January 21, 2010-
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) said yesterday that the prediction in its landmark 2007 report was “poorly substantiated” and resulted from a lapse in standards. “In drafting the paragraph in question the clear and well-established standards of evidence, required by the IPCC procedures, were not applied properly,” the panel said. “The chair, vice-chair and co-chairs of the IPCC regret the poor application of IPCC procedures in this instance.”
And from The Australian on Tuesday Jan. 19, 2010 -
An Australian glacier expert, Cliff Ollier of the University of Western Australia, accuses the IPCC of being “deliberately alarmist” with its predictions about melting glaciers because he says the organisation has a vested interest in global warming. “Glaciers started to retreat in 1895 when there was no correlation to global warming,” Ollier says. “Now we are seeing a general retreat on glaciers because we are coming out of an ice age, but there is nothing alarming about it. These retreats are not caused only by temperatures.” More details can be found HERE.
MANY RECORDS for Cold Temperatures in 2009:
HAWAII January 20, 2009 – Temperatures at Kahului Airport dipped down to 53 degrees Monday morning, tying a record set in 1951, according to the National Weather Service.
INDIA December 28, 2009 – (just last month) “Calcutta is galloping towards the 10-degree mark with the Celsius on Sunday dipping to a decade’s December low of 11.4 degrees.”
An official of the India Meteorological Department (IMD) in Delhi said: “It looked a little uncertain on Saturday, but Sunday’s further fall seems to have sealed the deal, with the minimum temperature likely to be around 10 degrees Celsius by Wednesday. It could turn out to be the coldest Calcutta winter ever.” The city has already had its coldest Christmas this decade and the coldest December 31 of the Noughties looks a certainty.
AUSTRALIA - April 29, 2009 – A new Australian record was set early this morning, a temperature of minus 13 degrees, at Charlotte Pass on the Snowy Mountains. This is the lowest temperature recorded anywhere in Australia in April and is 13 below the average. Nearby at Perisher it dipped to minus 11 degrees and at the top of Thredbo it dipped to minus 10.
Across the border, on the Victorian Alps April records were broken at Mt Hotham where it chilled to minus eight degrees and Mt Buller and Falls Creek where it got as low as minus seven. A few other locations set April low temperature records also. [Remember, their April is likened to our October, their seasons differing from the Northern Hemisphere by 6 months.]
DAKAR, GUINEA (West Africa) - 20 February 2009 (IRIN) – Near-freezing temperatures in north-central Guinea in January destroyed crops and livestock on which thousands of people depend for food as well as cash.
Elderly locals told IRIN they had never seen cold this intense in Mali, a town in Guinea’s Labé region.
“The vegetation looks as if it was burned in a fire,” Hannibal Barry of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) told IRIN from Mali on 19 February during a joint evaluation by UN agencies, local authorities and NGOs.
Temperatures dropped to 1.4 degrees Celsius from 17 to 26 January, according to a preliminary report by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and World Food Programme (WFP).
The cold wiped out crops – mainly potatoes, tomatoes, peppers, onions and bananas – across five districts in Mali.
The cold also provoked at least 1,115 spontaneous abortions in goats and sheep, Diallo said. Souleymane Diaby Barry, a livestock technician in Mali, told IRIN the affected animals were in an advanced stage of gestation and that stress can cause spontaneous abortion during this period. “This is the first time I have seen abortions caused by cold,” he said.
SASKATCHEWAN - 2009 could very well be the coldest year on record for Saskatchewan. Environment Canada’s top weatherman Dave Phillips says we’ve had colder than normal temperatures since December. “I could only find one year where you had nine consecutive months of cooler than normal, so it really is historic in the wrong way so to speak.”
So far, it has been the second coldest summer in Saskatchewan in nearly 100 years. Full article here.
ITEM – Just over a week ago, Dallas, Texas had its first white Christmas in more than 80 years – “More than 2 inches of snow…”. And Weather forecasters are warning of ”the kind of cold not seen since December 2000″ for the entire SouthEast United States, predicting frozen orange groves and potential harm to Seniors, pets and children.
Perhaps the best refutation of the alarmist Global Warming claims made by the United Nations ICPP, gross exaggerations and lies from Al Gore and denials from the UK East Anglia CRU, is the actual climate itself. Mind you, weather does not equal climate, but how many heat waves, droughts and high temperature records made the case FOR global warming on the News?
But in this case, it’s not just weather, but a year-long trend. In fact, the world saw record cold all around the globe in Winter 2008-9 and into November 2009. Some snapshots…
- North America/Canada – October 3rd largest snow cover extent on record
- United Kingdom – coldest winter since 1996-7 at 3.2 degrees C
- “North Pole” – Arctic sea ice extent increased for 2nd year in a row since 2007 minimum
- Russia – February 2009 temperatures 3-6 degrees C below 1961-90 average
- China – Heaviest snowfall in 55 years in Hebei province, heaviest snowfall on record in Shaanxi province
Above from ncdc.noaa.gov and also…
- Record cool July temperatures in Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Pennsylvania and West Virginia
- 27 of the 50 United States had Summers colder than normal, 11 of them rated Much Colder than Normal by NOAA
- The cool US Summer continued into October, the 3rd Coolest on record, with 42 states reporting temperatures below normal
- And in Antarctica, a 30-year minimum Antarctic snowmelt occurred during austral Summer 2008-9. I repeat, a 30-year MINIMUM MELT.
How’s that global warmth Mr. Gore, Dr. Jones, Dr. Mann? I’m thinking you might be getting some chills right about now….
ITEM – I just found this great presentation by the very credible founder of The Weather Channel, John Coleman
Courtesy of youtube.com
[Update] Yes, it was substantiated that New York Times reporter Andrew Revkin left “America’s Newspaper”. His last article on staff was Dec 21, and any even brief mention the Global Warming SCAM “Climategate” was conspicuous in its absence!
The latest article on his own blog, of all places, discusses Global Warming skeptics in their own “raucous gathering” at Copenhagen, with a very unapologetic statement mid-article “most scientists believe that the ensuing scandal, while noteworthy, does little to undermine the fundamental notion that human activity — chiefly spewing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere — is contributing to a warming of the planet.”
Bunk! Where’s your data, Mr. Journalist? Which survey? What’s the margin of error, sample size, question placement?
Then, there’s a link to a previous NYT article – this time on the main news website, co-written by Revkin, that offers more apologies for the “settled science” [NOT] of anthropogenic global warming (AGW).
I have to ask – how can there be a story about Climategate when an actual participant in the emails, and the main author of the websites is not even mentioned as involved?! Nor does he offer an answer, explanation, even an excuse for his involvement?! See dotEarth blog
Something more of interest: Here’s part of an email sent to us, that shows a very cozy level of cooperation between Michael Mann – author of the now very debunked “hockey stick” theory, and Revkin.
From: Michael Mann
To: Grant F
Subject: Re: ENSO blamed over warming – paper in JGR
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 10:28:31 -0400
good news Grant, we can trust him to be professional.
on a related note, a few folks have expressed concern that the galley-formatting of the
article w/out any label such as “submitted to JGR” is a bit misleading. some people think
the paper has already gone to press!
we should add a clear label such as “sub judice” or “submitted” to any posted and/or
circulating version of this,
mike
p.s. I’ve already had to correct both Andy Revkin and Joe Romm on this!
Although, another blog post by also-named Center for American Progress Dr. Joseph Romm seems to be against Mr. Revkin. About Romm:
In 2009, Rolling Stone named Romm #88 on its list of The 100 “people who are reinventing America” calling him “America’s fiercest climate-change activist-blogger.”
Then, here’s a not so veiled threat from Mike Schlesinger, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois, that Revkin could be “cut off” for what they considered sloppy journalism. Hmmm – sounds like a great bunch of guys to be cut “in” with, eh?
Andy:Copenhagen prostitutes?Climate prostitutes?Shame on you for this gutter reportage. [Emphasis added.]This is the second time this week I have written you thereon, the first about giving space in your blog to the Pielkes.The vibe that I am getting from here, there and everywhere is that your reportage is very worrisome to most climate scientists.Of course, your blog is your blog.But, I sense that you are about to experience the ‘Big Cutoff’ from those of us who believe we can no longer trust you, me included.Copenhagen prostitutes?Unbelievable and unacceptable.What are you doing and why?Michael
-
*UPDATE* Lapdog Slate interview with Al Gore – Gore quietly and only partially retracts his December 8th “10-year old emails” quoted thrice, in a footnote added wa-a-a-a-y at the bottom of the December 8th John Dickerson Slate interview web page.
Update: In the interview, Al Gore said that the e-mails printed from researchers at the University of East Anglia were 10 years old. They are more recent than that, including many from 2009. In response, Gore has issued a statement: “The e-mail exchanges that I focused on are approximately 10 years old. Some of the e-mail exchanges cited by others are more recent. None of them change the scientific consensus in any way.”
So okay patriots, here you go <Full Slate interview here> Pick this apart and comment below. I’ll check at least hourly for comments, and I’m happy to link to your moral and ethical website, too.
-
Dec 8, 2009: Wall Street Journal’s livemint.com - “Follow the money” to explain the “professional climate” that produced the Climategate situation
“… HSBC estimates $94 billion has been spent globally this year on what it calls “green stimulus”—largely ethanol and other alternative energy schemes—of the kind from which Al Gore and his partners at Kleiner Perkins hope to profit handsomely.
Supply, as we know, creates its own demand. So for every additional billion in government-funded grants (or the tens of millions supplied by foundations such as the Pew Charitable Trusts), universities, research institutes, advocacy groups and their various spin-offs and dependants have emerged from the woodwork to receive them.
Today these groups form a kind of ecosystem of their own. They include not just old standbys like the Sierra Club or Greenpeace, but also Ozone Action, Clean Air Cool Planet, Americans for Equitable Climate Change Solutions, the Alternative Energy Resources Association, the California Climate Action Registry and so on and on. All of them have been on the receiving end of climate change-related funding, so they must believe in the reality (and catastrophic imminence) of global warming just as a priest must believe in the existence of God.”
-
EPA Director Lisa Jackson lumps CO2 in with 5 “other” Greenhouse Gases, calling them a source of “endangerment” to the US population. Further data <here>
12/7/2009 2:33PM WASHINGTON D.C. – After a thorough examination of the scientific evidence and careful consideration of public comments, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today that greenhouse gases (GHGs) threaten the public health and welfare of the American people.
EPA’s endangerment finding covers emissions of six key greenhouse gases – carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulfur hexafluoride – that have been the subject of scrutiny and intense analysis for decades by scientists in the United States and around the world.
So, with the stroke of a pen, Climategate may be effectively trumped by clever beauraucratic manipulation. Developing…
Full story at EPA’s PR website <here>.
-
UN alleges Russia involvement in Climategate email “theft”. Real truth may be very different from that… <read it here>
-
CO2 production will be at an all-time high in Copenhagen for – 1200+ limos, over 100 private planes (full story here)
Climategate Graphs -Hockey Stick graph, is dead… in 2003! <Article and graphs here>
-
UN Executive Secretary Yvo de Boer:
“A new climate treaty can be ready by June 2010″, hopes UN’s chief climate negotiator Yvo de Boer. A few days before the Copenhagen conference, de Boer is positive that the parties will reach a political agreement on central issues. <Full Article on UN website>
-
Houston had an icy night after record early snowfall - (Houston Chronicle)
-
Schwarzenegger TRULY a Republican In Name Only (RINO)…
…teams up with Google to introduce interactive Government website that predicts San Francisco will be under water! And the timing of this re. Copenhagen makes it an order of magnitude more preposterous! [Ed's question: Was Arnold our first stealth government leader, or just the one with the heaviest accent?] [2nd Ed's question: With friends like Google, who needs a bailout?!]
-
LATEST re. NASA —->Thursday Dec 3 Washington Times Story
‘The fight over global warming science is about to cross the Atlantic with a U.S. researcher poised to sue NASA, demanding release of the same kind of climate data that has landed a leading British center in hot water over charges it skewed its data.
Chris Horner, a senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, said NASA has refused for two years to provide information under the Freedom of Information Act that would show how the agency has shaped its climate data and would explain why the agency has repeatedly had to correct its data going as far back as the 1930s.
“I assume that what is there is highly damaging,” Mr. Horner said. “These guys are quite clearly bound and determined not to reveal their internal discussions about this.”
The numbers matter. Under pressure in 2007, NASA recalculated its data and found that 1934, not 1998, was the hottest year in its records for the contiguous 48 states.’
-
A great Global Warming Debunked blog
-
Read Ann Coulter’s latest column <<HERE>>
-
Wall Street Journal OpEd Dec 2 - “Science is dying”
-
Best Links I’ve found re. ClimateGate Global Warming Hoax are at Ironic Surrealism blog
This is good, found at asiasociety.com (Global Warming supporter, but Schwarz’s comments aren’t censored, to their credit):
J. SCHWARZ | 11:22:09 12:18pm
OK – SETTLE DOWN EVERYONE!!! – YOU ARE RUNNING SCARED – YOU ARE DOING EXACTLY WHAT WAS PLANNED BY THOSE IN OUR WORLD WHO WANT POWER AND CONTROL FOR THEMSELVES – THEY CREATE AN ENEMY AND SCARE EVERYONE TO DEATH – THEN WE CLING TO THEM TO “SAVE” US!!! Please Grow up and get informed and quit running and enjoy your life – READ THE REAL FACTS HERE: Pete’sPlace Does GLOBAL WARMING have you all heated up? Come join me and let’s discuss the subject. Let’s expose the frauds and reveal the truth. Let’s try to recover some sanity from all the hysteria. The Death Blow to Climate Science Written by Dr. Tim Ball, Canada Free Press Saturday, November 21 2009 09:43 Global Warming is often called a hoax. I disagree because a hoax has a humorous intent to puncture pomposity. In science, such as with the Piltdown Man hoax, it was done to expose those with fervent but blind belief. The argument that global warming is due to humans, known as the anthropogenic global warming theory (AGW) is a deliberate fraud. I can now make that statement without fear of contradiction because of a remarkable hacking of files that provided not just a smoking gun, but an entire battery of machine guns. Someone hacked in to the files of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) based at the University of East Anglia. A very large file (61 mb) was downloaded and posted to the web. Phil Jones Director of the CRU has acknowledged the files are theirs. They contain papers, documents letters and emails. The latter are the most damaging and contain blunt information about the degree of manipulation of climate science in general and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in particular. Climate science hijacked and corrupted by this small group of scientists Dominant names involved are ones I have followed throughout my career including, Phil Jones, Benjamin Santer, Michael Mann, Kevin Trenberth, Jonathan Overpeck, Ken Briffa and Tom Wigley. I have watched climate science hijacked and corrupted by this small group of scientists. This small, elite, community was named by Professor Wegman in his report to the National Academy of Science (NAS). I had the pleasure of meeting the founder of CRU Professor Hubert Lamb, considered the Father of Modern Climatology, on a couple of occasions. He also peer reviewed one of my early publications. I know he would be mortified with what was disclosed in the last couple of days. Jones claims the files were obtained illegally as if that absolves the content. It doesn’t and it is enough to destroy all their careers.
Jones gave a foretaste of his behavior in 2005. Warwick Hughes asked for the data and method he used for his claim of a 0.6°C temperature rise since the end of the nineteenth century. Jones responded, “We have 25 years or so invested in the work. Why should I make the data available to you when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it?” He has stonewalled ever since. The main reason was because it was used as a key argument in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Reports to convince the world humans caused rapid warming in the 20th century. The emails obtained are a frightening record of arrogance, and deception far beyond his 2005 effort. Another glimpse into what the files and emails reveal was the report by Professor Deming. He wrote, “ With publication of an article in Science (in 1995) I gained sufficient credibility in the community of scientists working on climate change. They thought I was one of them someone who would pervert science in the service of social and political causes. So one of them let his guard down. A major person working in the area of climate change and global warming sent me an astonishing email that said. “We must get rid of the Medieval Warm Period.” The person in question was Jonathan Overpeck and his even more revealing emails are part of those exposed by the hacker. It is now very clear that Deming’s charge was precise. They have perverted science in the service of social and political causes. Professor Wegman showed how this “community of scientists” published together and peer reviewed each other’s work. I was always suspicious about why peer review was such a big deal. Now all my suspicions are confirmed. The emails reveal how they controlled the process, including manipulating some of the major journals like Science and Nature. We know the editor of the Journal of Climate, Andrew Weaver, was one of the “community”. They organized lists of reviewers when required making sure they gave the editor only favorable names. They threatened to isolate and marginalize one editor who they believed was recalcitrant. Total Control These people controlled the global weather data used by the IPCC through the joint Hadley and CRU and produced the HadCRUT data. They controlled the IPCC, especially crucial chapters and especially preparation of the Summary for PolicyMakers (SPM). Stephen Schneider was a prime mover there from the earliest reports to the most influential in 2001. They also had a left wing conduit to the New York Times. The emails between Andy Revkin and the community are very revealing and must place his journalistic integrity in serious jeopardy. Of course the IPCC Reports and especially the SPM Reports are the basis for Kyoto and the Copenhagen Accord, but now we know they are based on completely falsified and manipulated data and science. It is no longer a suspicion. Surely this is the death knell for the CRU, the IPCC, Kyoto and Copenhagen and the Carbon Credits shell game. CO2 never was a problem and all the machinations and deceptions exposed by these files prove that it was the greatest deception in history, but nobody is laughing. It is a very sad day for science and especially my chosen area of climate science. As I expected now it is all exposed I find there is no pleasure in “I told you so.”
READ THESE EMAILS FROM THE GUYS WHO FABRICATED THIS WHOLE GLOBAL WARMING SCAM: Saturday, November 21, 2009 The Deception And Lies Of The Global Warming Alarmists These are not “climate scientists”, they should be called what they are, criminals, and they should be prosecuted for fraud. Global Warming Establishment Uncovered, by – Julie Walsh The electronic files of the Climate Research Unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia, UK have been hacked and 61 MB worth of emails, approximately a thousand documents, have been posted on the internet on a Russian server. CRU is one of the few institutions in the world that compile and maintain the records of the world’s temperature data. In an interview with “Investigate” magazine, the director of CRU Professor Phil Jones said, “It was a hacker. We were aware of this about three or four days ago that someone had hacked into our system and taken and copied loads of data files and emails.” Anthony Watts has the evolving story at WattsUpWithThat.com. Here are some of the most revealing and shocking email quotes unearthed so far (my emphases): On Oct 14, 2009, at 5:57 PM, Tom Wigley wrote: Mike (Mann), The Figure you sent is very deceptive. As an example, historical runs with PCM look as though they match observations — but the match is a fluke. PCM has no indirect aerosol forcing and a low climate sensitivity — compensating errors. In my (perhaps too harsh) view, there have been a number of dishonest presentations of model results by individual authors and by IPCC. This is why I still use results from MAGICC to compare with observed temperatures. At least here I can assess how sensitive matches are to sensitivity and forcing assumptions/uncertainties. From: Phil Jones To: “Michael E. Mann” Subject: HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL Date: Thu Jul 8 16:30:16 2004 The other paper by MM is just garbage – as you knew. De Freitas again. Pielke is also losing all credibility as well by replying to the mad Finn as well – frequently as I see it. I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow – even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is ! From: Kevin Trenberth To: Michael Mann Cc: Stephen H Schneider , Myles Allen , peter stott , “Philip D. Jones” , Benjamin Santer , Tom Wigley , Thomas R Karl , Gavin Schmidt , James Hansen , Michael Oppenheimer Subject: Re: BBC U-turn on climate Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:57:37 -0600 The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t. From: Phil Jones To: “Michael E. Mann” Subject: IPCC & FOI Date: Thu May 29 11:04:11 2008 Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4? Keith will do likewise. He’s not in at the moment – minor family crisis. Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same? I don’t have his new email address. We will be getting Caspar to do likewise. I see that CA claim they discovered the 1945 problem in the Nature paper!! From: Ben Santer To: P.Jones Subject: Re: CEI formal petition to derail EPA GHG endangerment finding with charge that destruction of CRU raw data undermines integrity of global temperature record Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 11:07:56 -0700 I’m really sorry that you have to go through all this stuff, Phil. Next time I see Pat Michaels at a scientific meeting, I’ll be tempted to beat the crap out of him. Very tempted. My colleague Chris Horner wrote a book published in 2008 on this exact subject, “Red Hot Lies: How Global Warming Alarmists Use Threats, Fraud, and Deception to Keep You Misinformed” Posted by Peter at 11:03 AM 0 comments Links to this post Labels: Global warming fraud
From: Michael Mann
To: Grant F
Subject: Re: ENSO blamed over warming – paper in JGR
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 10:28:31 -0400
good news Grant, we can trust him to be professional.
on a related note, a few folks have expressed concern that the galley-formatting of the
article w/out any label such as “submitted to JGR” is a bit misleading. some people think
the paper has already gone to press!
we should add a clear label such as “sub judice” or “submitted” to any posted and/or
circulating version of this,
mike
p.s. I’ve already had to correct both Andy Revkin and Joe Romm on this!
From: Michael Mann
To: Grant F
Subject: Re: ENSO blamed over warming – paper in JGR
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 10:28:31 -0400
good news Grant, we can trust him to be professional.
on a related note, a few folks have expressed concern that the galley-formatting of the
article w/out any label such as “submitted to JGR” is a bit misleading. some people think
the paper has already gone to press!
we should add a clear label such as “sub judice” or “submitted” to any posted and/or
circulating version of this,
mike
p.s. I’ve already had to correct both Andy Revkin and Joe Romm on this!
December 3rd, 2009 at 12:43 pm
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Larry McEver and Al D'Amario, Al D'Amario. Al D'Amario said: RT @2010_Vision Climategate Coneonspiracy: NASA may have falsified data. http://bit.ly/CliMateGaTe NAS is not NASA in this 1 run on sentence [...]
December 3rd, 2009 at 6:56 pm
If we start with the studies of what works in climate forecasting, the Milankavitch cycles, and expand on what has turned out to be true about solar cycles according to Theodor Landscheidt, ( the only one to correctly forecast the long solar minimum we are passing through). The evidence points to the natural variability factors as being the effects of the rotation or the galaxy and the swirl imparted to the local area of the spiral arm we seem to reside in (Milankavich), and by the inertial dampening of the planets effects on the barycenter of the solar system, moves the sun’s center of mass around as it tries to stay magnetically and gravitationally centered in the swirling magnetic fields, plasma, and dust clouds, and other stars joining us in this dance to the celestial music as it were.
(Landscheidt) Found the driving forces of the Inertial dampening of the system and defined it to the point of predictability, it only seems that that the next steps would be to analyze the effects of the interactions of the Inner planets, which have a rhythmic pattern to their orbital relationships, and their relations to the weather patterns they share. Most good discoveries come from the individuals who seek the truth with out consideration for the limited vision of the thundering herd mentality.
With climategate we have seen the latest stampede, of hurried angst ridden, fear mongering, driving of the ignorant sheep of the world away from the truth and into the pens. By the politically minded “think they know what the rest of us need crowd,” that are controlling the funds, research orientation, and imposing their goals upon the process, to achieve profits as they see fit, to stay in power.
I have quietly undertaken the study of the relationships between the interactions of the Sun’s magnetic fields borne on the solar wind, and it’s interactions with the Earth’s weather patterns to the point I have found the cyclic patterns of the shorter decadeal durations, that show up as the natural background variances in the climate RAW data sets. Starting with the history of research into planetary motions and the Lunar declination,(the Earth / Moon system’s response to the rotation of the magnetic poles of the sun. In order to find a natural analog to the patterns in the weather there were several things I had to consider.
The results of the analog cyclic pattern I discovered repeat with in a complex pattern of Inner planet harmonics, and outer planet longer term interferences that come round to the 172 year pattern Landscheidt discovered, so this is just the shorter period set of variables, that further define the limits, of the natural variables needed to be considered, along side the CO2 hypothesis, as the longer term/period parents (Milankivich and Landscheidt cycles) of these driving forces are valid. It would be in error if they were not considered and calculated into the filtering of the swings in the climate data, for forecasting longer terms into the future.
A sample of the cyclic pattern found in the meteorological database is presented as a composite of the past three cycles composited together and plotted onto maps for a 5 year period starting in 2008, and running to January of 2014, on a rough draft website I use to further define the shifts in the pattern from the past three to the current cycle, to continue learning about the details of the interactions.
http://www.aerology.com
The building of Stonehenge at the end of the last ice age, was done as the weather in the area was changing from tundra, to grasses and shrubs, in waves from the El nino effects at the time.
They began a study of the relationship between the Solar and Lunar declinational movement timing, found the lunar 18.6 year Mn minimum/maximum declinational cycle, the 19 year Metonic cycle where the moon is at the same phase and maximum declination on the same date every 19 years, and the 6585 day Saris cycle of eclipses.
From combining the annual seasonal effects of apparent solar declination, and the short term effects of the Lunar declinational movement. The Incas and Mayans understood repeating weather patterns well enough to build a thriving culture, that supported a much larger population, than the area currently barely supports in poverty.
Then along came the Conquistadors, that were assumed to be the gods foretold in prophecy, who took over and killed off the high priests and the learned class (because the Catholic priests with them were convinced, they were idolaters and heretics.) so all were lost that understood how the “Pagan religion†was able to grow that much food with little problems, by the timing of celebrations and festivals that the people partook of, in a joyous and productive mood.
The Mayan stone masons who were busy carving out the next stone block to carve another 300 years of calendar upon, were put to work mining gold to export back to Spain. So with the next stone block unfinished, and in the rough, still in the quarry the Mayan calendar comes to an end in 2012.
Most of the population of the area was either killed in battles, or worked to death, while on cocaine to minimize food consumption, and mined gold for export by the false gods.
At home in Europe the Spanish inquisition sought to wipe out the fund of knowledge, (that went underground) about the interactions of the Solar and Lunar declinational movements and other sidereal stellar influences on people, and things in the natural world. As the result of mass killings, and book burnings much knowledge, and data history was lost.
Nicolas Copernicus, (19, February 1473 – 24 May 1543) and Nostradamus, (21 December, 1503 – 2 July 1566) Were around at about the same time and may have collaborated in person, or through a net work of underground friends. To give Nostradamus the idea to convert the data sets of past history sorted by geocentric astrology locations and positions, to a Heliocentric data base from which he drew his famous quatrains. There are many references to late night calculations, aside observations that may have given him his accuracy. Then along came Galileo Galilie , (15, February, 1564 – 8 January, 1642) with proof, that round moons circled round planets.
With the advent of good fast cheap computers, I was able to look at data sets ( although with considerably less coverage due to centuries of suppression,) and sort for Planetary and Lunar influences, and found that the Lunar declinational component, of the orbital movements, of the Moon, was responsible for the driving, of the Rossby Wave patterns, in sync with the lunar declinational tidal forces at work in the atmosphere.
How does this all work you ask? Well there is a magnetic field that surrounds the sun, and magnetic fields, that are invested in the body of the Galaxy. These large scale standing fields, interact to produce fluctuations in the strength of the fields felt upon the Earth as it moves in it’s orbit.
The poles of the Earth are tilted to the axis of the solar system ~23 ½ degrees, giving us the changing seasons. The sun on the other hand is different it’s axis of rotation is vertical, but the magnet poles are tilted ~12 degrees, so as it rotates on an average of 27.325 day period, the polarity of the magnetic fields felt via the solar wind, shifts from the result of the orientation determined by the position of the rotating magnetic poles of the sun.
The inner core of the moon has frozen, the outer core of the Earth is still molten, and a concentration of the magnetically permeable materials that make up the earth. These pulses of alternating North then South magnetic field shifts has been going on since before the Earth condensed into a planet and then was later struck by a Mars sized object (so the current theory goes), that splashed off most of the crust.
Most returned to the Earth, some was lost into interplanetary space, and some condensed into the moon. Somewhere in the process the center of mass of the moon gravitated toward the surface that faces the Earth, before it froze, causing that denser side to always face the Earth.
It is not the center of mass of the Earth that scribes the orbital path of the Earth about the sun but the center of mass of the composite Earth / moon barycenter that lies about 1,200 kilometers off of the center of mass of the Earth, always positioned between the center of the earth and the center of the Moon. So as the Moon rotates around the earth to create the lunar light phases, the center of mass of the earth goes from inside to out side, around the common barycenter. As the Moon moves North / South in it’s declination, the center of mass of the earth goes the opposite direction to counter balance, around their common barycenter that scribes the smooth ellipse of the orbit around the sun. So really the Earth makes 13 loops like a strung out spring every year.
The magnetic impulses in the solar wind has driven the Moon / Earth into the declinational dance that creates the tides in phase in the atmosphere, because of the pendulum type movement the Moon hangs at the extremes of declination almost three days with in a couple of degrees then makes a fast sweep across the equator at up to 7 to 9 degrees per day. At these culminations of declination movement the polarity of the solar wind peaks and reverses, causing a surge in the reversal of the ion flux generated as a result. Because of the combination of both peak of Meridian flow surge in the atmosphere, and reversal of ion charge gradient globally occurs at the same time like clock work most severe weather occurs at these times.
Because of the semi boundary conditions caused by mountain ranges, the Rockies, Andes, Urals, Alps, Himalayas, that resulted in topographical forcing into a four fold pattern of types of Jet stream patterns, I had to use not a 27.325 day period but a 109.3 day period to synchronize the lunar declinational patterns into the data to get clearer repeatability than the same data set filtered by Lunar phase alone.
There is a pattern of 6554 days where in the inner planets, Mars, Earth, Venus, and Mercury, make an even number of orbital revolutions, and return to almost the same relative position to the star field.
By adding 4 days to this period I get 6558 days the time it takes the Moon to have 240 declinational cycles of 27.325 days, so that by using 6558 days as a synchronization period I get the lunar Declination angle, lunar phase, perigee / apogee cycle, and the relative positions of the inner planets to align from the past three (6558 day) cycles well enough that the average of the temperatures, and the totals of the precipitations give a picture of the repeating pattern, from the last three to forecast the next almost 18 year long string of weather related events, with a better accuracy than the forecast available for three to five days from NOW from conventional NWS / NOAA sources.
So by looking at the periods of declinational movement and the four fold pattern of Rossby wave propagation, while maintaining the inner planet synchronization. I get all of these influences in sync to look almost the same, as the current conditions, even to periods of hail, and tornado production.
When the outer planets are added into the mix, they are out of phase in regard to the inner planet / Lunar patterns, and their influences are not in Sync with these background patterns. There are lines of magnetic force that connect each planet to the sun, and these revolve around with the planets naturally.
As the Earth’s orbit takes it between these outer planets and the sun (at Synodic conjunctions), the increase in magnetic fields carried via the solar wind, (to effect this outer planet coupling) is felt upon the Earth’s magnetosphere, and results in a temporary increase in the pole to equator charge gradient then a discharge back to ambient levels (about a two week long up then down cycle time), how this interferes or combines with the “usual lunar / inner planet patterns†is determined by whether it is in, or out of phase with the background patterns.
During normal charge cycles more moisture is driven into the atmosphere carrying positive Ions, along the ITCZ, and in discharge cycle phases waves of free electrons, and negative ions are sent down from the poles into the mid-latitudes. Charge cycles inhibit precipitation amounts and discharge cycles produce increased precipitation amounts along existing frontal boundaries, due to changes in residual ion charge differences between the air masses.
There is a seasonal increase in magnetic fields coupled from the center of out galaxy to the sun that peaks in mid June (summer solstice), and then decreases till winter solstice. As the magnetic charging cycle associated with this build up in Northern hemisphere Spring, it brings on a bias for surges of positive ionized air masses, that produces surges of tornadoes in phase with the lunar declinational culminations, and other severe weather, will also be enhanced by Synod conjunctions with outer planets, by the same increases of positively charged ions. The closer the timing of the conjunction to a peak lunar culmination the sharper the spike of production, like cracking a whip.
During discharge phases from summer solstice through fall in general, tropical storms manifest as large scale discharge patterns to ring the moisture, heat, and excess ions out of the tropical air masses. Outer planets conjunctions at these times help to build moisture reserves in the atmosphere, during their ion charge contribution, and enhance storms to category 4 and 5 levels when in phase with their discharge phase influences. So to say that the planets have no real influence on the world in general, is the same as to totally disregard how much the weather, effects how people live and survive.
I think that the influences felt at the surface, are just changes in the back ground stimuli, and not strongly controlling enough to lose free will, when we chose to interact with the total spectrum of stimuli that surrounds us at any particular moment. The 18+ year long repeating pattern is long enough that the other conditions surrounding a person have changed, via plant growth, soil changes, age, or location on the surface of the earth, since the last cycle.
On the ground, all plants that have roots in the soil share soil ions and nutrients, via microbial sharing, fungal predation, and companion plants that support each other. The organic matter from past growth that gives up valuable nutrients as it decays, and adds texture to the soil for better aeration and moisture penetration, form a mat of interacting processes, that breath life into the environment.
December 3rd, 2009 at 7:34 pm
[...] see: Latest on Climategate – NASA may have falsified data! The Fraud Is Everywhere: SUNY Albany and Queens University Belfast Join Climategate (PJM Exclusive) [...]
December 6th, 2009 at 12:47 am
[...] Unit (CRU) Climate Gate Pdf. Doc Drop: ‘Alleged Climate Research Unit (CRU) Leaked Emails’ Latest on Climategate – NASA may have falsified data! The Fraud Is Everywhere: SUNY Albany and Queens University Belfast Join Climategate (PJM Exclusive) [...]
December 7th, 2009 at 2:12 pm
[...] Unit (CRU) Climate Gate Pdf. Doc Drop: ‘Alleged Climate Research Unit (CRU) Leaked Emails’ Latest on Climategate – NASA may have falsified data! The Fraud Is Everywhere: SUNY Albany and Queens University Belfast Join Climategate (PJM Exclusive) [...]
December 7th, 2009 at 4:58 pm
[...] Unit (CRU) Climate Gate Pdf. Doc Drop: ‘Alleged Climate Research Unit (CRU) Leaked Emails’ Latest on Climategate – NASA may have falsified data! The Fraud Is Everywhere: SUNY Albany and Queens University Belfast Join Climategate (PJM Exclusive) [...]
December 8th, 2009 at 5:54 am
[...] This post was Twitted by LMack49 [...]
December 12th, 2009 at 5:46 pm
Check out the Copenhagen Document leaks, this knowledge may save your life! Do what you can with your Government Reps in your country to have these infringements on your life eliminated! You will literally be fighting for your and your family’s existence, Click the videos below:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAqqAnUxACY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94KH-WMZuw0
Request that PM Harper DOES NOT sign the Copenhagen Treaty, thereby causing Canadians to lose their Sovereignty and Freedom, email the PM at: pm@pm.gc.ca
Sign the petition to protest the Inaccurate Science measurements that are being used to base the Copenhagen Treaty off of: http://www.gopetition.com/online/32485.html
February 14th, 2010 at 3:45 am
Good day there, I encountered your webpage via Google and your spot appears really compelling for me.
February 28th, 2010 at 10:58 am
Howdy,
We are representing Hair Loss news. We manage lots of web sites, and we found your website trought the net. We are asking if you’d like to exchange links with us. Actualy we are on the lookout for links to our websites, if you are interested please visit our site, on the right menu you will find the list link, there you can submit your internet site and exchange links with us…
Our website pages are superb ranked, and they’re going to be better in the subsequent days…
Thank you very much, and I am sorry if i put the info in a wrong place, that because I couldn’t find the contact link..
Best regards
Keepingmyhair Staff.
Hair loss news
March 4th, 2010 at 5:46 pm
Hi guys,
I know this might be a bit off topic but seeing that a bunch of you own websites, where would the best place be to host. Someone recommended I use Blue Host for $6.95 a month which seems like a great deal. Anyone here on 2010vision.org using them?
March 10th, 2010 at 2:48 am
I am able to make link exchange with HIGH pr pages on related keywords like bad credit loans and other financial keywords.
My web page is http://www.usainstantpayday.com
If your page is important contact me.
please only good pages, wih PR>2 and related to financial keywords
Thanks
fliegegap
March 14th, 2010 at 5:53 pm
Hi there all, I just registered on this superb forum and wanted to say hello there! Have a extraordinary day!
March 14th, 2010 at 11:06 pm
I also heard Blue Host is very user friendly. If you decide to try them out, please follow this link and you’ll be supporting 2010vision.org in a small way, too!
April 1st, 2010 at 10:43 pm
Hi all,
my friend told me about this forum so i decided to sign up.
i have some very strong opinions
looking forward to talking to you all.
[IMG – http://www.trueimagehost.com/1/m/47xFMd46ie7B/blank.gif/IMG -
May 21st, 2010 at 1:39 pm
single tap kegerator
http://h2o.law.harvard.edu/ViewProject.do?projectID=12410
May 22nd, 2010 at 2:57 am
We should be painstaking and particular in all the information we give. We should be extraordinarily careful in giving advice that we would not think of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to refrain from giving recommendation which we don’t follow when it damages those who transport us at our word.
racor
http://racor-87.webs.com/apps/blog/ – racor